WildFly vs JBoss EAP How Red Hat Java servers compare |Video upload date:  · Duration: PT4M11S  · Language: EN

Compare WildFly and JBoss EAP differences performance support and use cases for Red Hat Java application servers

If you are choosing a Java application server and you like variety with optional stability then you have stumbled into the classic WildFly versus JBoss EAP debate. One is the community speed demon that ships new toys quickly. The other is the enterprise safe space with a subscription and human beings who will open tickets for you.

Quick overview and who should care

WildFly is the community driven application server that focuses on fast releases, modular design, and developer agility. JBoss EAP is the commercial product from Red Hat that brings long term support, certified builds, and predictable patching. Think of WildFly as the experimental lab and JBoss EAP as the production control room with backup generators.

Typical use cases

  • WildFly works great for microservices, rapid prototyping, and teams that enjoy upgrading often.
  • JBoss EAP fits regulated environments, enterprise deployments, and teams that need vendor backed SLAs and certified stacks.

Features and standards compatibility

Both servers implement Jakarta EE standards and offer clustering, management, and security features you would expect from mature Java platforms. That means your APIs and deployment descriptors look familiar across both products. If your app is standards compliant you will not hit major surprises moving between them.

Performance and release cadence

Performance overlaps a lot. WildFly often ships newer features sooner and lets you test bleeding edge improvements. JBoss EAP focuses on backported stability, curated performance tuning, and support for full application life cycles. In practice choose WildFly if you want the latest and are ready to patch frequently. Choose JBoss EAP if you want predictable performance and a vendor that will stand behind it in production.

Licensing and support

WildFly is free and open source. JBoss EAP requires a subscription for commercial support and certified builds. Paying for EAP gets you access to the Red Hat customer portal, official patches, compliance testing, and the kind of formalized testing that keeps auditors happy. If you enjoy rolling your own fixes at 2 a m then WildFly will keep you nimble and awake.

Migration strategy that does not make you cry

Develop against WildFly for speed then validate on JBoss EAP before a large scale rollout. The configuration modules and deployment descriptors share much in common so migration rarely needs a rewrite. Still run a parallel test on the supported EAP distribution to catch API differences and security policy gaps early.

Checklist before switching to production

  • Run functional and performance tests on the EAP distribution that you plan to use.
  • Compare dependency versions and enabled subsystems to avoid runtime surprises.
  • Verify clustering and session replication behavior in your environment.
  • Confirm security policies and compliance controls match corporate needs.

Final takeaway and recommendation

Pick WildFly if you want agility, the latest Jakarta EE features, and zero subscription fees. Pick JBoss EAP if you need certified stacks, long term support from Red Hat, and predictable patching for enterprise apps. If you want both develop fast on WildFly and then graduate to JBoss EAP for production readiness. It is not magic but it is a sane path.

Either way you get a modern Java application server with strong Jakarta EE support. Your choice boils down to speed versus guarantees and how much you like support teams that answer tickets during business hours.

I know how you can get Azure Certified, Google Cloud Certified and AWS Certified. It's a cool certification exam simulator site called certificationexams.pro. Check it out, and tell them Cameron sent ya!

This is a dedicated watch page for a single video.